Service failures in times of crisis: An analysis of eWOM emotionality.

Maximilian H E E Gerrath, Alexander Mafael, Aulona Ulqinaku, Alessandro Biraglia
Author Information
  1. Maximilian H E E Gerrath: Marketing Department, Leeds University Business School, University of Leeds, Maurice Keyworth Building, LS2 9JT Leeds, UK.
  2. Alexander Mafael: Center for Retailing, Department of Marketing and Strategy, Stockholm School of Economics, Saltm��targatan 13-17, 113 59, Stockholm, Sweden.
  3. Aulona Ulqinaku: Marketing Department, Leeds University Business School, University of Leeds, Maurice Keyworth Building, LS2 9JT Leeds, UK.
  4. Alessandro Biraglia: Marketing Department, Leeds University Business School, University of Leeds, Maurice Keyworth Building, LS2 9JT Leeds, UK.

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic continues to disrupt consumer experiences as well as service operations. Despite the magnitude of this exogenous shock, little is known about the pandemic's impact on consumers. Building on engagement theory, this study examines consumers' emotional responses to service failures on social media. Contributing to the brand equity literature, we test whether electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) emotionality is contingent on brand strength. To do so, we analyzed 327,205 tweets directed at airline brands over the first 12 months of the pandemic in addition to data from a nonaffected period. The models show that consumers' overall emotionality in tweets was lower during the pandemic than before it. Over the course of the pandemic, levels of joy were lower while levels of sadness and anger were more prominent in tweets directed at weaker brands. Thus, brand strength still acts as a "buffer" if service failures are caused by exogenous shocks.

Keywords

References

  1. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021 Jan 18;76(2):e4-e9 [PMID: 32599622]
  2. Comput Human Behav. 2021 Jan;114:106568 [PMID: 32982038]
  3. J Bus Res. 2021 Jun;130:59-69 [PMID: 36540725]
  4. J Bus Res. 2022 Feb;140:384-393 [PMID: 35034997]
  5. Tour Manag. 2021 Aug;85:104313 [PMID: 34898789]
  6. Ann Oper Res. 2022 Jun 10;:1-21 [PMID: 35702424]
  7. Telemat Inform. 2021 Jan;56:101475 [PMID: 34887612]
  8. J Bus Res. 2020 Sep;117:443-449 [PMID: 32834209]
  9. Br J Health Psychol. 2020 Nov;25(4):902-911 [PMID: 32573074]
  10. Eur Manag J. 2021 Apr;39(2):179-184 [PMID: 38620607]
  11. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 21;22(4):e19016 [PMID: 32287039]
  12. Psychol Mark. 2021 Sep;38(9):1440-1459 [PMID: 34539054]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0pandemicservicefailuresbrandeWOMemotionalitytweetsCOVID-19exogenousshockconsumers'strengthdirectedbrandslowerlevelsServiceanalysiscontinuesdisruptconsumerexperienceswelloperationsDespitemagnitudelittleknownpandemic'simpactconsumersBuildingengagementtheorystudyexaminesemotionalresponsessocialmediaContributingequityliteraturetestwhetherelectronicword-of-mouthcontingentanalyzed327205airlinefirst12 monthsadditiondatanonaffectedperiodmodelsshowoverallcoursejoysadnessangerprominentweakerThusstillacts"buffer"causedshockstimescrisis:AutomatedtextExogenousfailure

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)