Democratising the design and delivery of large-scale randomised, controlled clinical trials in primary care: A personal view.

Christopher C Butler
Author Information
  1. Christopher C Butler: Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Primary Care Clinical Trials Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rapid identification of effective treatments for use in the community during a pandemic is vital for the well-being of individuals and the sustainability of healthcare systems and society. Furthermore, identifying treatments that do not work reduces research wastage, spares people unnecessary side effects, rationalises the cost of purchasing and stockpiling medication, and reduces inappropriate medication use. Nevertheless, only a small minority of therapeutic trials for SARS-CoV-2 infections have been in primary care: most opened too late, struggled to recruit, and few produced actionable results. Participation in research is often limited by where one lives or receives health care, and trial participants may not represent those for whom the treatments are intended.
INNOVATIVE TRIALS: The ALIC4E, PRINCIPLE and the ongoing PANORAMIC trial have randomised over 40,500 people with COVID-19. This personal view describes how these trials have innovated in: (by using novel adaptive platform designs); (by complementing traditional site-based recruitment ('the patient comes to the research') with mechanisms to enable sick, infectious people to participate without having to leave home ('taking research to the people'), and by addressing the 'inverse research participation law,' which highlights disproportionate barriers faced by those who have the most to contribute, and benefit from, research, and; in by evaluating nine medicines to support guidelines and care decisions world-wide for COVID-19 and contribute to antimicrobial stewardship.
CONCLUSION: The PRINCIPLE and PANORAMIC trials represent models of innovation and inclusivity, and exemplify the potential of primary care to lead the way in addressing pressing global health challenges.

Keywords

References

  1. Trials. 2022 Jan 20;23(1):62 [PMID: 35057841]
  2. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 May;22(5):e153-e158 [PMID: 34951954]
  3. Lancet. 2021 Sep 4;398(10303):843-855 [PMID: 34388395]
  4. J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Apr;30(4):408-16 [PMID: 25373834]
  5. Lancet. 2021 Mar 20;397(10279):1063-1074 [PMID: 33676597]
  6. Lancet. 2023 Jan 28;401(10373):281-293 [PMID: 36566761]
  7. BMJ. 1997 Aug 9;315(7104):350-2 [PMID: 9270458]
  8. Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Aug;9(8):924-932 [PMID: 34051877]
  9. Int J Equity Health. 2022 Jan 14;21(1):6 [PMID: 35031078]
  10. Ulster Med J. 2019 May;88(2):130-132 [PMID: 31105354]
  11. Lancet. 2021 Jun 12;397(10291):2251-2252 [PMID: 34119064]
  12. N Engl J Med. 2022 Apr 14;386(15):1397-1408 [PMID: 35172054]
  13. Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Jun;68(671):294-295 [PMID: 29853596]
  14. BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 18;11(6):e046799 [PMID: 34145016]
  15. BMJ. 2020 Jan 21;368:l6802 [PMID: 31964641]
  16. N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 4;375(5):454-63 [PMID: 27518663]
  17. ERJ Open Res. 2018 May 08;4(2): [PMID: 29761108]
  18. Br Med J. 1976 Sep 4;2(6035):556-9 [PMID: 786428]
  19. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 May;62(5):464-75 [PMID: 19348971]
  20. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013 Feb;13(2):123-9 [PMID: 23265995]
  21. Br J Gen Pract. 2022 Jun 30;72(720):e446-e455 [PMID: 35440469]
  22. N Engl J Med. 2022 Feb 10;386(6):509-520 [PMID: 34914868]
  23. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Oct;90:92-98 [PMID: 28694123]
  24. Lancet. 2020 Jan 4;395(10217):42-52 [PMID: 31839279]
  25. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2020 Jun;53:66-70 [PMID: 32418715]
  26. Lancet. 1971 Feb 27;1(7696):405-12 [PMID: 4100731]
  27. Public Health. 2019 Dec;177:80-94 [PMID: 31557667]
  28. Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Sep;9(9):1010-1020 [PMID: 34329624]
  29. Lancet. 2015 May 2;385(9979):1729-1737 [PMID: 25640810]
  30. BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 7;13(8):e069176 [PMID: 37550022]
  31. BMJ. 2014 Apr 09;348:g2545 [PMID: 24811411]
  32. Lancet Glob Health. 2021 May;9(5):e711-e720 [PMID: 33865476]
  33. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Sep;125:1-8 [PMID: 32416336]
  34. BMJ. 2020 Jan 21;368:l6228 [PMID: 31964628]
  35. BJGP Open. 2021 Oct 26;5(5): [PMID: 34312163]
  36. Br J Gen Pract. 1997 Jul;47(420):449-52 [PMID: 9281875]

MeSH Term

Humans
Antimicrobial Stewardship
COVID-19
Health Facilities
Pandemics
Primary Health Care
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Research Design
Adaptive Clinical Trials as Topic

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0researchtrialstreatmentspeopleprimarycareusereducesmedicationcare:healthtrialrepresentPRINCIPLEPANORAMICrandomisedCOVID-19personalviewdesignsaddressingcontributeBACKGROUND:Rapididentificationeffectivecommunitypandemicvitalwell-beingindividualssustainabilityhealthcaresystemssocietyFurthermoreidentifyingworkwastagesparesunnecessarysideeffectsrationalisescostpurchasingstockpilinginappropriateNeverthelesssmallminoritytherapeuticSARS-CoV-2infectionsopenedlatestruggledrecruitproducedactionableresultsParticipationoftenlimitedonelivesreceivesparticipantsmayintendedINNOVATIVETRIALS:ALIC4Eongoing40500describesinnovatedin:usingnoveladaptiveplatformcomplementingtraditionalsite-basedrecruitment'thepatientcomesresearch'mechanismsenablesickinfectiousparticipatewithoutleavehome'takingpeople''inverseparticipationlaw'highlightsdisproportionatebarriersfacedbenefitevaluatingninemedicinessupportguidelinesdecisionsworld-wideantimicrobialstewardshipCONCLUSION:modelsinnovationinclusivityexemplifypotentialleadwaypressingglobalchallengesDemocratisingdesigndeliverylarge-scalecontrolledclinicalGeneralpractice/familymedicineepidemiologyexperimentalgeneraltreatment/intervention

Similar Articles

Cited By (2)