Unpacking the notion of "serious" genetic conditions: towards implementation in reproductive decision-making?

Erika Kleiderman, Felicity Boardman, Ainsley J Newson, Anne-Marie Laberge, Bartha Maria Knoppers, Vardit Ravitsky
Author Information
  1. Erika Kleiderman: Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada. erika.kleiderman.1@umontreal.ca. ORCID
  2. Felicity Boardman: Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK. ORCID
  3. Ainsley J Newson: Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Health Ethics, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. ORCID
  4. Anne-Marie Laberge: Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
  5. Bartha Maria Knoppers: Centre of Genomics and Policy, Department of Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. ORCID
  6. Vardit Ravitsky: Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Abstract

The notion of a "serious" genetic condition is commonly used in clinical contexts, laws, and policies to define and delineate both the permissibility of and, access to, reproductive genomic technologies. Yet, the notion lacks conceptual and operational clarity, which can lead to its inconsistent appraisal and application. A common understanding of the relevant considerations of "serious" is lacking. This article addresses this conceptual gap. We begin by outlining existing distinctions around the notion of "serious" that will factor into its appraisal and need to be navigated, in the context of prenatal testing and the use of reproductive genomic technologies. These include tensions between clinical care and population health; the impact of categorizing a condition as "serious"; and the role of perception of quality of life. We then propose a set of four core dimensions and four procedural elements that can serve as a conceptual tool to prompt a mapping of the features of seriousness in any given context. Ultimately, consideration of these core dimensions and procedural elements may lead to improvements in the quality and consistency of decision-making where the seriousness of a genetic condition is a pivotal component at both a policy and practice level.

References

  1. Soc Sci Med. 1999 Apr;48(8):977-88 [PMID: 10390038]
  2. J Law Med. 2008 Oct;16(2):233-45 [PMID: 19010002]
  3. PLoS One. 2014 Dec 10;9(12):e114391 [PMID: 25494330]
  4. J Genet Couns. 2018 Feb;27(1):69-84 [PMID: 28664217]
  5. Soc Sci Med. 2021 Oct;287:114367 [PMID: 34534781]
  6. Public Health Ethics. 2021 Jun 14;14(2):202-217 [PMID: 34650621]
  7. Eur J Hum Genet. 2022 Feb;30(2):160-169 [PMID: 34565797]
  8. Soc Sci Med. 2003 Sep;57(5):949-58 [PMID: 12850119]
  9. J Med Ethics. 2022 Dec;48(12):1060-1067 [PMID: 34244346]
  10. J Genet Couns. 2018 Feb;27(1):16-20 [PMID: 29052810]
  11. Psychother Psychosom. 1998;67(6):317-22 [PMID: 9817953]
  12. Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Jun;105(6):1561-1570 [PMID: 34711447]
  13. Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2016 Mar;121(2):121-38 [PMID: 26914467]
  14. J Genet Couns. 2021 Apr;30(2):574-587 [PMID: 33124158]
  15. Health Psychol Open. 2021 Jan 13;8(1):2055102920987455 [PMID: 33489303]
  16. Bioethics. 2023 May;37(4):359-366 [PMID: 36744627]
  17. Soc Sci Med. 2006 Jul;63(1):32-42 [PMID: 16431006]
  18. Hum Genet. 2022 May;141(5):1003-1012 [PMID: 34426854]
  19. Soc Sci Med. 2023 Aug;330:116046 [PMID: 37392648]
  20. Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jun;303:115021 [PMID: 35588654]
  21. J Genet Couns. 2019 Feb;28(1):141-154 [PMID: 30629758]
  22. Prenat Diagn. 2022 Dec;42(13):1658-1666 [PMID: 36289583]
  23. Eur J Hum Genet. 2025 Mar;33(2):220-225 [PMID: 38678162]
  24. Sociol Health Illn. 2023 Jul;45(6):1376-1392 [PMID: 37341685]
  25. BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Aug 08;20(1):56 [PMID: 31395047]
  26. Sociol Health Illn. 2014 Jan;36(1):137-50 [PMID: 24111508]
  27. J Med Ethics. 2019 Aug;45(8):508-513 [PMID: 31326898]
  28. Qual Life Res. 2020 Aug;29(8):2073-2087 [PMID: 32170584]
  29. Prenat Diagn. 2003 Dec 15;23(12):1003-8 [PMID: 14663838]
  30. Laryngoscope. 2001 Apr;111(4 Pt 1):715-8 [PMID: 11359145]
  31. Disabil Soc. 1998 Nov;13(5):665-81 [PMID: 11660717]
  32. Health Care Anal. 2020 Mar;28(1):25-44 [PMID: 31119609]
  33. Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 22;9:725877 [PMID: 35004561]
  34. Ann Intern Med. 2020 May 19;172(10):688-692 [PMID: 32311739]
  35. Health Policy. 2014 Jun;116(2-3):281-8 [PMID: 24690334]
  36. Prenat Diagn. 2020 Sep;40(10):1246-1257 [PMID: 32474937]
  37. Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 Feb;40(2):297-306 [PMID: 33523739]
  38. Eur J Hum Genet. 2022 Feb;30(2):140-141 [PMID: 34782753]
  39. Eur J Hum Genet. 2025 Mar;33(2):226-230 [PMID: 38811715]
  40. Am J Med Genet. 2002 Feb 15;108(1):29-35 [PMID: 11857546]
  41. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2018 Mar;178(1):24-37 [PMID: 29512888]
  42. Am J Med Genet A. 2016 Mar;170(3):565-73 [PMID: 26889673]
  43. J Genet Couns. 2021 Feb;30(1):85-97 [PMID: 33184995]
  44. Soc Sci Med. 2017 Oct;191:186-193 [PMID: 28926777]
  45. Am J Med Genet A. 2011 Aug;155A(8):1777-85 [PMID: 21567935]
  46. Soc Sci Med. 2011 Aug;73(4):498-506 [PMID: 21794967]
  47. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2022 Aug;64(8):944-949 [PMID: 35191027]
  48. Genet Med. 2022 Sep;24(9):1803-1813 [PMID: 35659827]
  49. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2003;9(1):40-7 [PMID: 12587137]
  50. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2010 Apr;15(2):90-7 [PMID: 20176664]
  51. Sociol Health Illn. 2023 Jul;45(6):1223-1241 [PMID: 36181509]
  52. Health Expect. 2018 Feb;21(1):201-211 [PMID: 28703871]

Grants

  1. /Wellcome Trust
  2. 203384/Z/16/Z/Wellcome Trust

MeSH Term

Humans
Genetic Testing
Female
Decision Making
Genetic Diseases, Inborn
Prenatal Diagnosis

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0"serious"notiongeneticconditionreproductiveconceptualclinicalgenomictechnologiescanleadappraisalcontextqualityfourcoredimensionsproceduralelementsseriousnesscommonlyusedcontextslawspoliciesdefinedelineatepermissibilityaccessYetlacksoperationalclarityinconsistentapplicationcommonunderstandingrelevantconsiderationslackingarticleaddressesgapbeginoutliningexistingdistinctionsaroundwillfactorneednavigatedprenataltestinguseincludetensionscarepopulationhealthimpactcategorizingroleperceptionlifeproposesetservetoolpromptmappingfeaturesgivenUltimatelyconsiderationmayimprovementsconsistencydecision-makingpivotalcomponentpolicypracticelevelUnpackingconditions:towardsimplementationdecision-making?

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)