Is dynamic balance impaired in people with non-specific low back pain when compared to healthy people? A systematic review.

Fulvio Dal Farra, Federico Arippa, Mauro Arru, Martina Cocco, Elisa Porcu, Federico Solla, Marco Monticone
Author Information
  1. Fulvio Dal Farra: Department of Information Engineering, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
  2. Federico Arippa: Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy - federico.arippa@unica.it.
  3. Mauro Arru: Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, UMG University, Catanzaro, Italy.
  4. Martina Cocco: Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, UMG University, Catanzaro, Italy.
  5. Elisa Porcu: Rehabilitation Medicine and Neurorehabilitation, P.O. San Martino, Oristano, Italy.
  6. Federico Solla: Surgery Unit, Lenval University Children's Hospital, Nice, France.
  7. Marco Monticone: Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Low back pain (LBP) represents a frequent health issue in most of the countries; in recent years, there was a growing interest concerning the role of balance and postural stability in individuals with non-specific LBP (NS-LBP). The aim of this systematic review is to provide a synthesis of the evidence on the association between NS-LBP and an impaired dynamic balance.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: The reporting of this study followed the 2020 PRISMA statement. Analytical observational studies, investigating the dynamic balance performance via functional or motor-tasks tests in LBP in comparison to healthy people, were searched in PubMed, Embase and Scopus up to December 2023. Their characteristics were reported in a standardized form, and their methodological quality was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for cross-sectional studies.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A qualitative synthesis of the study findings and a discussion of the results are provided. 19 cross-sectional studies were included in this review, with an overall sample size of 894. A meta-analysis was not possible due to high levels of heterogeneity across the studies. None of the included studies were deemed to be of a good methodological quality. Overall, most studies reported differences between NS-LBP and healthy people in terms of dynamic balance, showing worst performances in NS-LBP, both at motor-task tests and at the posturography.
CONCLUSIONS: impaired dynamic balance seems to be correlated to NS-LBP. However, due to the presence of methodological issues in the included studies, further confirmations are needed. Clinicians should take into consideration the importance of a balance assessment in NS-LBP, by implementing proper functional tests. High-quality observational research is recommended, to assess dynamic balance with standardized and uniform modalities, in relation to specific stages of the condition.

References

  1. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2016 Nov 21;29(4):887-893 [PMID: 27341640]
  2. BMJ. 2008 Apr 26;336(7650):924-6 [PMID: 18436948]
  3. Brain Sci. 2021 Apr 19;11(4): [PMID: 33921655]
  4. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jan;95(2):e2414 [PMID: 26765419]
  5. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2006 Nov;21(9):881-92 [PMID: 16806618]
  6. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2017 Jul;15:1-6 [PMID: 28641764]
  7. Mov Disord. 2006 Sep;21(9):1515-20 [PMID: 16817196]
  8. Gait Posture. 2009 Jul;30(1):5-10 [PMID: 19318253]
  9. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 01;17(9): [PMID: 32370043]
  10. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2019 Jan;7(1):52-60 [PMID: 30805416]
  11. Gait Posture. 2006 Nov;24(3):349-55 [PMID: 16311036]
  12. J Chiropr Med. 2017 Sep;16(3):189-194 [PMID: 29097947]
  13. Joint Bone Spine. 2011 May;78(3):291-7 [PMID: 20971670]
  14. Physiother Res Int. 2015 Mar;20(1):9-15 [PMID: 24619777]
  15. Gait Posture. 2011 May;34(1):97-102 [PMID: 21530268]
  16. Exp Brain Res. 2007 Mar;177(3):411-8 [PMID: 16977448]
  17. J Biomech Eng. 2019 May 2;: [PMID: 31049580]
  18. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 28;9:CD009790 [PMID: 34580864]
  19. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2020 May 27;32(1):25 [PMID: 32660559]
  20. Evid Based Med. 2017 Jun;22(3):85-87 [PMID: 28320705]
  21. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014 Aug;26(8):1139-41 [PMID: 25202168]
  22. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 Feb;53(2):207-16 [PMID: 10729693]
  23. Am J Otol. 1998 Nov;19(6):797-803 [PMID: 9831157]
  24. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021 Feb;107(1S):102769 [PMID: 33321235]
  25. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 May 15;28(10):1074-9 [PMID: 12768152]
  26. Disabil Rehabil. 2017 May;39(10):994-1001 [PMID: 27215948]
  27. Eur Spine J. 2014 Oct;23(10):2105-13 [PMID: 25064093]
  28. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2013 Nov-Dec;36(9):612-8 [PMID: 24229576]
  29. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2022 Jun;58(3):423-434 [PMID: 34636528]
  30. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2020 Jun;52:102423 [PMID: 32416446]
  31. Children (Basel). 2022 Jun 22;9(7): [PMID: 35883923]
  32. Eur J Pain. 2016 Apr;20(4):541-51 [PMID: 26198386]
  33. Gait Posture. 2014 Sep;40(4):715-8 [PMID: 25086800]
  34. Res Sports Med. 2022 Nov-Dec;30(6):628-640 [PMID: 34028310]
  35. Phys Ther Sport. 2016 Nov;22:29-34 [PMID: 27579805]
  36. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2017 Sep 22;30(5):1023-1029 [PMID: 28800302]
  37. J Sports Sci Med. 2021 Mar 08;20(2):229-236 [PMID: 34211315]
  38. Lancet. 2018 Jun 9;391(10137):2356-2367 [PMID: 29573870]
  39. Motor Control. 2023 Oct 24;28(1):15-28 [PMID: 37875258]
  40. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jun;134:178-189 [PMID: 33789819]
  41. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2022 Jan;29:239-250 [PMID: 35248277]
  42. Physiother Theory Pract. 2024 Sep;40(9):1942-1951 [PMID: 37377096]
  43. PLoS One. 2020 Jun 5;15(6):e0233857 [PMID: 32502177]
  44. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2022 Feb;58(1):68-75 [PMID: 34042409]
  45. Brain Res. 2000 Sep 22;877(2):401-6 [PMID: 10986360]
  46. J Athl Train. 2013 Sep-Oct;48(5):621-6 [PMID: 24067151]
  47. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008 Nov;119(11):2424-36 [PMID: 18789756]
  48. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2009 Jun;19(3):380-90 [PMID: 18023594]
  49. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2018 Mar;53:22-30 [PMID: 29407352]
  50. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2018 Mar;2(3):223-228 [PMID: 30169257]
  51. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 1999 Dec;14(10):710-6 [PMID: 10545625]

MeSH Term

Humans
Postural Balance
Low Back Pain
Cross-Sectional Studies

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0balancestudiesNS-LBPdynamicLBPreviewtestshealthypeoplemethodologicalincludedbackpainnon-specificsystematicsynthesisimpairedEVIDENCEstudyobservationalfunctionalreportedstandardizedqualitycross-sectionaldueINTRODUCTION:LowrepresentsfrequenthealthissuecountriesrecentyearsgrowinginterestconcerningroleposturalstabilityindividualsaimprovideevidenceassociationACQUISITION:reportingfollowed2020PRISMAstatementAnalyticalinvestigatingperformanceviamotor-taskscomparisonsearchedPubMedEmbaseScopusDecember2023characteristicsformevaluatedusingJoannaBriggsInstituteCriticalAppraisalChecklistSYNTHESIS:qualitativefindingsdiscussionresultsprovided19overallsamplesize894meta-analysispossiblehighlevelsheterogeneityacrossNonedeemedgoodOveralldifferencestermsshowingworstperformancesmotor-taskposturographyCONCLUSIONS:ImpairedseemscorrelatedHoweverpresenceissuesconfirmationsneededClinicianstakeconsiderationimportanceassessmentimplementingproperHigh-qualityresearchrecommendedassessuniformmodalitiesrelationspecificstagesconditionlowcomparedpeople?

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.