Knowledge Activation Versus Sentence Mapping when Representing Fictional Characters' Emotional States.

Morton Ann Gernsbacher, Rachel R W Robertson
Author Information
  1. Morton Ann Gernsbacher: Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, U.S.A.
  2. Rachel R W Robertson: Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, U.S.A.

Abstract

We investigated the role that knowledge activation and sentence mapping play in how readers represent fictional characters' emotional states. The subjects read stories that described concrete actions, such as a main character stealing money from a store where his best friend worked and later learning that his friend had been fired. By manipulating the content of the stories (i.e. writing stories that implied different emotional states), we affected what emotional knowledge would be activated. Following each story, the subjects read a target sentence that contained an emotion word. By manipulating the emotion word in each target sentence (i.e. whether it matched mismatched the emotional state implied by the story), we affected how easily subjects could map the target sentence onto their developing mental structures. In Experiment 1, we further isolated the role of knowledge activation from the role of sentence mapping with a density manipulation. When the subjects read many emotional stories, they more widely activated their knowledge of emotional states. Using a proportionality manipulation in Experiment 2, we demonstrated that this result was not due to the subjects' strategies.

References

  1. Mem Cognit. 1982 Mar;10(2):181-7 [PMID: 7087782]
  2. Psychol Rev. 1988 Apr;95(2):163-82 [PMID: 3375398]
  3. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1988 Jul;14(3):410-20 [PMID: 2969940]
  4. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1986 Jan;12(1):82-91 [PMID: 2949049]
  5. J Exp Psychol. 1971 Oct;90(2):227-34 [PMID: 5134329]
  6. Mem Cognit. 1983 Jul;11(4):374-81 [PMID: 6633256]
  7. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1984 Jun;10(3):340-57 [PMID: 6242411]
  8. Mem Cognit. 1984 Jul;12(4):315-28 [PMID: 6503694]
  9. Mem Cognit. 1977 Jan;5(1):84-9 [PMID: 21331872]
  10. Cogn Emot. 1992;6(2):89-111 [PMID: 25309018]
  11. Mem Cognit. 1984 Nov;12(6):590-606 [PMID: 6533428]
  12. Mem Cognit. 1990 Nov;18(6):611-31 [PMID: 2266863]
  13. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1986 Apr;12(2):208-19 [PMID: 2939178]

Grants

  1. K04 NS001376/NINDS NIH HHS
  2. R01 NS029926/NINDS NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0emotionalsentenceknowledgesubjectsstoriesrolestatesreadtargetactivationmappingfriendmanipulatingieimpliedaffectedactivatedstoryemotionwordExperimentmanipulationinvestigatedplayreadersrepresentfictionalcharacters'describedconcreteactionsmaincharacterstealingmoneystorebestworkedlaterlearningfiredcontentwritingdifferentFollowingcontainedwhethermatchedmismatchedstateeasilymapontodevelopingmentalstructures1isolateddensitymanywidelyUsingproportionality2demonstratedresultduesubjects'strategiesKnowledgeActivationVersusSentenceMappingRepresentingFictionalCharacters'EmotionalStates

Similar Articles

Cited By