Continuous glucose monitoring in people with diabetes: the randomized controlled Glucose Level Awareness in Diabetes Study (GLADIS).

J P New, R Ajjan, A F H Pfeiffer, G Freckmann
Author Information
  1. J P New: Department of Diabetes, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK.

Abstract

AIMS: To investigate the best glucose monitoring strategy for maintaining euglycaemia by comparing self-monitoring of blood glucose with continuous glucose monitoring, with or without an alarm function.
METHODS: A 100-day, randomized controlled study was conducted at four European centres, enrolling 160 patients with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes, on multiple daily insulin injections or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. Participants were randomized to continuous glucose monitoring without alarms (n = 48), continuous glucose monitoring with alarms (n = 49) or self-monitoring of blood glucose (n = 48).
RESULTS: Time spent outside the glucose target during days 80-100 was 9.9 h/day for the continuous glucose monitoring without alarms group, 9.7 h/day for the continuous glucose monitoring with alarms group and 10.6 h/day for the self-monitoring of blood glucose group (P = 0.18 and 0.08 compared with continuous glucose monitoring without and with alarms, respectively).The continuous glucose monitoring with alarms group spent less time in hypoglycaemia compared with the self-monitoring of blood glucose group (1.0 h/day and 1.6 h/day, respectively; 95% CI -1.2 to -0.1; P = 0.030). Among those treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion, time spent outside the glucose target was significantly different when comparing continuous glucose monitoring without alarms and self-monitoring of blood glucose (-1.9 h/day; 95% CI -3.8 to 0.0; P = 0.0461) and when comparing continuous glucose monitoring with alarms and self-monitoring of blood glucose (-2.4 h/day; 95% CI -4.1 to -0.5; P = 0.0134). There was no difference in HbA1c reduction from baseline in the three groups; however, the proportion of participants with a reduction of ≥ 6 mmol/mol (≥ 0.5%) was higher in the continuous glucose monitoring without alarms (27%) and continuous glucose monitoring with alarms groups (25%) than in the self-monitoring of blood glucose group (10.6%).
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the use of continuous glucose monitoring reduces time spent outside glucose targets compared with self-monitoring of blood glucose, especially among users of insulin pumps.

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Blood Glucose
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Female
Glycated Hemoglobin
Humans
Hypoglycemic Agents
Infusions, Subcutaneous
Injections, Subcutaneous
Insulin
Insulin Infusion Systems
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Middle Aged
Monitoring, Physiologic
Outcome Assessment, Health Care
Prospective Studies
Quality of Life
Self Care
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult

Chemicals

Blood Glucose
Glycated Hemoglobin A
Hypoglycemic Agents
Insulin

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0glucosemonitoringcontinuousalarmsself-monitoringbloodwithoutgroup1insulinspentP = 0comparingrandomizedoutside0comparedtime95%CIcontrolledstudyType2subcutaneousinfusionn = 48target99 h/day106 h/dayrespectively-1-0reductiongroupsAIMS:investigatebeststrategymaintainingeuglycaemiaalarmfunctionMETHODS:100-dayconductedfourEuropeancentresenrolling160patientsdiabetesmultipledailyinjectionsParticipantsn = 49RESULTS:Timedays80-1007 h/day1808Thelesshypoglycaemia0 h/day030Amongtreatedsignificantlydifferent-380461-24 h/day-450134differenceHbA1cbaselinethreehoweverproportionparticipantsof ≥ 6 mmol/mol≥ 05%higher27%25%6%CONCLUSIONS:showsusereducestargetsespeciallyamonguserspumpsContinuouspeoplediabetes:GlucoseLevelAwarenessDiabetesStudyGLADIS

Similar Articles

Cited By (34)