Current perspectives in the management of keratoconus with contact lenses.

Li Lim, Elizabeth Wen Ling Lim
Author Information
  1. Li Lim: Singapore National Eye Centre, 11 Third Hospital Avenue, Singapore, 168751, Singapore. lim.li@singhealth.com.sg. ORCID
  2. Elizabeth Wen Ling Lim: Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.

Abstract

Our aim is to review current and significant articles on contact lens wear in keratoconus patients. A comprehensive literature search of PubMed was performed for the following topics on contact lens wear in keratoconus patients: (1) characteristics of contact lens wearers, (2) safety and efficacy, (3) complications, (4) fitting techniques, (5) contact lens wear after procedures/surgeries, (6) patient satisfaction. A total of 104 studies were finally selected and reviewed. Gas permeable (GP) lens wear provided significantly better vision than glasses. Special cone design lenses had better patient comfort levels though there was no difference in best corrected visual acuity among the GP lenses. Soft lenses showed good efficacy for the treatment of mild-to-moderate keratoconus with newer designs improving visual performance such as customised hydrogel and novel pinhole lenses. Scleral and hybrid lenses provide good visual acuity and comfort for keratoconic patients previously intolerant to RGP lenses. RGP lens wear post-cross linking (CXL) is relatively well-tolerated. Contact lenses may still be required post intrastromal corneal ring procedures and post keratoplasty. Scheimpflug imaging and anterior segment optical coherent tomography (ASOCT) are useful in contact lens fitting. Computerized contact lens fitting techniques could reduce the chair time of lens fitting as well as improve comfort and visual performance. Contact lenses play an important role in the visual rehabilitation of keratoconus patients. New contact lens designs and materials have significantly expanded the available fitting options for keratoconus patients. Imaging technology can be utilized to guide contact lens fitting.

References

  1. Ophthalmology. 2019 Jan;126(1):P170-P215 [PMID: 30366794]
  2. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2011 Nov-Dec;21(6):685-90 [PMID: 21462156]
  3. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2010 Aug;33(4):167-70 [PMID: 20547093]
  4. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2010 Jun;33(3):112-8 [PMID: 20129811]
  5. Optom Vis Sci. 2005 Dec;82(12):1014-21 [PMID: 16357642]
  6. Optometry. 2001 Sep;72(9):574-84 [PMID: 11575695]
  7. Eye (Lond). 2002 Jan;16(1):54-9 [PMID: 11913889]
  8. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2013 Jun;36(3):126-9 [PMID: 23276713]
  9. Cornea. 2009 Jul;28(6):607-15 [PMID: 19512912]
  10. Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Oct;90(10):1078-85 [PMID: 23974663]
  11. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2007 Sep;30(4):223-32 [PMID: 17481941]
  12. Optom Vis Sci. 2016 Feb;93(2):150-7 [PMID: 26657697]
  13. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2014 Nov-Dec;24(6):835-41 [PMID: 24557753]
  14. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2012 Aug;35(4):175-9 [PMID: 22409949]
  15. Cornea. 2020 Mar;39(3):386-393 [PMID: 31599780]
  16. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2016 Oct;39(5):375-9 [PMID: 27209480]
  17. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:795738 [PMID: 26075261]
  18. Eye Contact Lens. 2008 Sep;34(5):254-60 [PMID: 18779664]
  19. Int Ophthalmol. 2018 Aug;38(4):1521-1530 [PMID: 28646439]
  20. Eye Contact Lens. 2014 Jan;40(1):2-6 [PMID: 24296956]
  21. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2010 May;30(3):267-73 [PMID: 20444133]
  22. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2018 Jun;41(3):307-310 [PMID: 29221710]
  23. Cornea. 2005 Apr;24(3):269-77 [PMID: 15778597]
  24. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2019 Feb;42(1):111-116 [PMID: 30075938]
  25. Eye Contact Lens. 2014 Mar;40(2):71-3 [PMID: 24418864]
  26. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2013 Jun;36(3):146-50 [PMID: 23291263]
  27. Eye Contact Lens. 2007 Mar;33(2):103-5 [PMID: 17496704]
  28. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2007 Nov;27(6):561-7 [PMID: 17956361]
  29. Eye Contact Lens. 2019 Mar;45(2):141-148 [PMID: 30005055]
  30. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2013 Feb;36(1):45-8 [PMID: 23108009]
  31. Curr Eye Res. 2015;40(11):1088-94 [PMID: 25495191]
  32. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Aug 09;54(8):5385-91 [PMID: 23882688]
  33. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2009 Feb;32(1):16-21 [PMID: 18799346]
  34. Eye Contact Lens. 2006 Mar;32(2):96-101 [PMID: 16538132]
  35. Eye Contact Lens. 2010 Jul;36(4):220-2 [PMID: 20539234]
  36. Optom Vis Sci. 2018 Apr;95(4):391-398 [PMID: 29554011]
  37. Eye Contact Lens. 2018 Nov;44 Suppl 2:S54-S59 [PMID: 28953598]
  38. Eye Contact Lens. 2011 Nov;37(6):381-5 [PMID: 21983547]
  39. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jan;185:43-47 [PMID: 29103959]
  40. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2002 Mar;31(2):234-7 [PMID: 11957565]
  41. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2010 Feb;33(1):19-22 [PMID: 19939725]
  42. Eye (Lond). 2007 May;21(5):614-23 [PMID: 16498438]
  43. Int J Ophthalmol. 2015 Oct 18;8(5):1074-7 [PMID: 26558228]
  44. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2016 Oct-Dec;23(4):283-287 [PMID: 27994389]
  45. Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Jul;90(7):e191-7 [PMID: 23748847]
  46. Eye Contact Lens. 2013 Jul;39(4):269-72 [PMID: 23771007]
  47. Eye Contact Lens. 2006 Jul;32(4):207-10 [PMID: 16845268]
  48. Clin Exp Optom. 2013 Mar;96(2):219-24 [PMID: 23278637]
  49. Optom Vis Sci. 2004 Mar;81(3):182-8 [PMID: 15017177]
  50. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002 Nov;134(5):689-95 [PMID: 12429244]
  51. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017 Mar;175:169-172 [PMID: 28039037]
  52. CLAO J. 1989 Oct-Dec;15(4):282-9 [PMID: 2680163]
  53. Optom Vis Sci. 2017 Sep;94(9):908-913 [PMID: 28816727]
  54. Can J Ophthalmol. 2018 Feb;53(1):66-70 [PMID: 29426444]
  55. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2016 Jun;39(3):217-20 [PMID: 26669275]
  56. Eye Contact Lens. 2014 Mar;40(2):95-8 [PMID: 24508772]
  57. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014 Apr;98(4):442-7 [PMID: 24368629]
  58. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2017 Jun;40(3):143-150 [PMID: 28057440]
  59. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2017 Jun;40(3):157-161 [PMID: 28366677]
  60. Optom Vis Sci. 2007 Apr;84(4):334-42 [PMID: 17435517]
  61. Eye Contact Lens. 2011 Sep;37(5):307-11 [PMID: 21792058]
  62. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2019 Jun;42(3):334-338 [PMID: 30594471]
  63. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2005 May;25(3):254-60 [PMID: 15854073]
  64. Cornea. 2013 Feb;32(2):205-10 [PMID: 23146931]
  65. Cornea. 2009 May;28(4):477-9 [PMID: 19411974]
  66. Eye Contact Lens. 2004 Jan;30(1):20-4 [PMID: 14722464]
  67. Optom Vis Sci. 2018 Jun;95(6):515-522 [PMID: 29787490]
  68. CLAO J. 2002 Apr;28(2):83-7 [PMID: 12054377]
  69. Eye Contact Lens. 2012 Jan;38(1):43-8 [PMID: 22157394]
  70. Clin Exp Optom. 2017 Jul;100(4):375-379 [PMID: 27549574]
  71. Eye Contact Lens. 2012 May;38(3):179-82 [PMID: 22543730]
  72. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004 Oct;138(4):527-35 [PMID: 15488776]
  73. Optom Vis Sci. 2016 Aug;93(8):855-60 [PMID: 27232897]
  74. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013 Jun;251(6):1565-70 [PMID: 23392819]
  75. Clin Exp Optom. 2017 Jul;100(4):369-374 [PMID: 27654998]
  76. Int Ophthalmol. 2016 Dec;36(6):799-805 [PMID: 26895272]
  77. Eye Contact Lens. 2010 Mar;36(2):86-9 [PMID: 20145543]
  78. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2007 Mar-Apr;55(2):121-5 [PMID: 17322602]
  79. Am J Ophthalmol. 1986 Mar 15;101(3):267-73 [PMID: 3513592]
  80. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2010 Jun;33(3):128-35 [PMID: 20053579]
  81. Clin Exp Optom. 2015 Mar;98(2):150-4 [PMID: 25557946]
  82. Eye Contact Lens. 2004 Jan;30(1):54-8 [PMID: 14722472]
  83. Surv Ophthalmol. 1998 Jan-Feb;42(4):297-319 [PMID: 9493273]
  84. Clin Exp Optom. 2013 Mar;96(2):245-8 [PMID: 23387325]
  85. Optom Vis Sci. 2015 Mar;92(3):318-23 [PMID: 25599340]
  86. Eye Contact Lens. 2016 Jul;42(4):225-30 [PMID: 26340384]
  87. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2014 Feb;37(1):20-5 [PMID: 23953969]
  88. J Curr Ophthalmol. 2017 Aug 26;30(1):85-86 [PMID: 29564415]
  89. Eye Contact Lens. 2009 May;35(3):123-7 [PMID: 19421018]
  90. Eye (Lond). 2009 Mar;23(3):586-92 [PMID: 18344958]
  91. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2020 Dec;43(6):543-552 [PMID: 31924530]
  92. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2016 Apr;39(2):148-53 [PMID: 26474924]
  93. Eye Contact Lens. 2018 Nov;44 Suppl 2:S314-S317 [PMID: 29373388]
  94. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998 Dec;39(13):2537-46 [PMID: 9856763]
  95. Curr Eye Res. 2008 Nov;33(11):933-9 [PMID: 19085375]
  96. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Jul;49(7):2964-70 [PMID: 18579760]
  97. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2015 Oct;38(5):351-6 [PMID: 26055226]
  98. Ophthalmology. 2003 Jun;110(6):1110-8 [PMID: 12799234]
  99. Cornea. 2015 Apr;34(4):359-69 [PMID: 25738235]
  100. Ophthalmology. 2008 Oct;115(10):1655-62 [PMID: 18538404]
  101. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2012 Feb;35(1):17-21 [PMID: 21920799]
  102. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2012 Oct;35(5):222-7 [PMID: 22633003]
  103. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2009 May;29(3):321-9 [PMID: 19422564]
  104. Optom Vis Sci. 2002 Aug;79(8):493-501 [PMID: 12199541]
  105. Eye Contact Lens. 2017 Jul;43(4):230-235 [PMID: 27171130]
  106. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2018 Aug;41(4):351-356 [PMID: 29398334]
  107. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2016 Apr;79(2):82-4 [PMID: 27224068]
  108. Eye Contact Lens. 2016 May;42(3):185-9 [PMID: 26214530]
  109. Optom Vis Sci. 2014 Oct;91(10):1221-30 [PMID: 24830371]
  110. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jan-Mar;21(1):50-5 [PMID: 24669146]
  111. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2014 Oct;37(5):377-81 [PMID: 25023601]
  112. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2017 Jan-Feb;80(1):17-20 [PMID: 28380096]
  113. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2018 Apr;41(2):180-186 [PMID: 28993070]

MeSH Term

Contact Lenses
Corneal Topography
Humans
Keratoconus
Prosthesis Fitting
Retrospective Studies
Sclera
Visual Acuity

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0lenscontactlenseskeratoconusfittingwearvisualpatientscomfortefficacytechniquespatientGPsignificantlybetteracuitygooddesignsperformanceRGPContactpostaimreviewcurrentsignificantarticlescomprehensiveliteraturesearchPubMedperformedfollowingtopicspatients:1characteristicswearers2safety3complications45procedures/surgeries6satisfactiontotal104studiesfinallyselectedreviewedGaspermeableprovidedvisionglassesSpecialconedesignlevelsthoughdifferencebestcorrectedamongSoftshowedtreatmentmild-to-moderatenewerimprovingcustomisedhydrogelnovelpinholeScleralhybridprovidekeratoconicpreviouslyintolerantpost-crosslinkingCXLrelativelywell-toleratedmaystillrequiredintrastromalcornealringprocedureskeratoplastyScheimpflugimaginganteriorsegmentopticalcoherenttomographyASOCTusefulComputerizedreducechairtimewellimproveplayimportantrolerehabilitationNewmaterialsexpandedavailableoptionsImagingtechnologycanutilizedguideCurrentperspectivesmanagement

Similar Articles

Cited By (18)