When we are worried, what are we thinking? Anxiety, lack of control, and conspiracy beliefs amidst the COVID-19 pandemic.

Jakub ��rol, Eva Ballov�� Miku��kov��, Vladim��ra ��avojov��
Author Information
  1. Jakub ��rol: Institute of Experimental Psychology Centre of Social and Psychological Sciences, Slovak Academy of Sciences Bratislava Slovakia. ORCID
  2. Eva Ballov�� Miku��kov��: Institute of Experimental Psychology Centre of Social and Psychological Sciences, Slovak Academy of Sciences Bratislava Slovakia. ORCID
  3. Vladim��ra ��avojov��: Institute of Experimental Psychology Centre of Social and Psychological Sciences, Slovak Academy of Sciences Bratislava Slovakia. ORCID

Abstract

Societal crises and stressful events are associated with an upsurge of conspiracy beliefs that may help people to tackle feelings of lack of control. In our study ( = 783), we examined whether people with higher feelings of anxiety and lack of control early in the COVID-19 pandemic endorse more conspiracy theories. Our results show that a higher perception of risk of COVID-19 and lower trust in institutions' response to the pandemic were related to feelings of anxiety and lack of control. Feeling the lack of control, but not anxiety, independently predicted COVID-19 conspiracy theory endorsement. Importantly, COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs were strongly correlated with generic conspiracy and pseudoscientific beliefs, which were likewise associated with the feeling of lack of control and lower trust in institutions. The results highlight that considering people's emotional responses to the COVID-19 pandemic is crucial for our understanding of the spread of conspiracy and pseudoscientific beliefs.

Keywords

References

  1. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 May;118(5):900-918 [PMID: 31904251]
  2. Psychol Health. 2011 Mar;26(3):371-82 [PMID: 20419560]
  3. QJM. 2020 Oct 1;113(10):707-712 [PMID: 32539153]
  4. Lancet. 2020 Mar 28;395(10229):1054-1062 [PMID: 32171076]
  5. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2015 Jun;47:111-9 [PMID: 25562749]
  6. J Health Psychol. 2022 Mar;27(3):534-547 [PMID: 33016131]
  7. Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 30;11:578586 [PMID: 33101147]
  8. Psychol Sci. 2013 May;24(5):622-33 [PMID: 23531484]
  9. Psychol Med. 2022 Jan;52(2):251-263 [PMID: 32436485]
  10. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2018 Nov;13(6):770-788 [PMID: 30231213]
  11. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 08;17(14): [PMID: 32650409]
  12. Global Health. 2020 Jul 6;16(1):57 [PMID: 32631403]
  13. PLoS One. 2020 Oct 30;15(10):e0241464 [PMID: 33125435]
  14. Front Psychol. 2013 Apr 30;4:225 [PMID: 23641227]
  15. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2017 Dec;26(6):538-542 [PMID: 29276345]
  16. Appl Cogn Psychol. 2021 May-Jun;35(3):720-729 [PMID: 33821088]
  17. Br J Soc Psychol. 2020 Jul;59(3):663-673 [PMID: 32592420]
  18. Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 02;11:561747 [PMID: 33132966]
  19. Psychol Bull. 2015 May;141(3):694-722 [PMID: 25688696]
  20. Appl Cogn Psychol. 2017 Jan-Feb;31(1):50-58 [PMID: 28163371]
  21. Science. 2008 Oct 3;322(5898):115-7 [PMID: 18832647]
  22. Politics Life Sci. 2019 Sep;38(2):193-209 [PMID: 32412208]
  23. Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2020 Nov;11(8):1110-1118 [PMID: 38602949]
  24. Mem Stud. 2017 Jul;10(3):323-333 [PMID: 29081831]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0conspiracybeliefslackcontrolCOVID-19anxietypandemicfeelingsassociatedpeoplehigherresultslowertrustpseudoscientificSocietalcrisesstressfuleventsupsurgemayhelptacklestudy=783examinedwhetherearlyendorsetheoriesshowperceptionriskinstitutions'responserelatedFeelingindependentlypredictedtheoryendorsementImportantlystronglycorrelatedgenericlikewisefeelinginstitutionshighlightconsideringpeople'semotionalresponsescrucialunderstandingspreadworriedthinking?AnxietyamidstCOVID���19epistemicallysuspect

Similar Articles

Cited By (59)