Comparison of ethidium monoazide and propidium monoazide for the selective detection of viable Legionella cells.

Bin Chang, Toshitsugu Taguri, Kanji Sugiyama, Junko Amemura-Maekawa, Fumiaki Kura, Haruo Watanabe
Author Information
  1. Bin Chang: Department of Bacteriology I, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan. b-chang@nih.go.jp

Abstract

ethidium monoazide (EMA) and propidium monoazide (PMA) have been utilized for selective PCR amplification of DNA from viable bacterial cells. In this study, we compared the abilities of EMA and PMA, together with real-time PCR, to specifically distinguish dead Legionella cells from viable cells. Several experiments showed that PMA or EMA treatment could specifically prevent the PCR amplification of DNA from dead Legionella cells in water samples. However, a 4-fold higher concentration of PMA than EMA was required to achieve this effect. EMA may therefore be more useful for practical environmental investigations of Legionella.

MeSH Term

Animals
Azides
Bacteriological Techniques
Enzyme Inhibitors
Humans
Legionella
Microbial Viability
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Propidium
Sensitivity and Specificity

Chemicals

Azides
Enzyme Inhibitors
propidium monoazide
Propidium
8-azidoethidium

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0EMAcellsmonoazidePMALegionellaPCRviablepropidiumselectiveamplificationDNAspecificallydeadEthidiumutilizedbacterialstudycomparedabilitiestogetherreal-timedistinguishSeveralexperimentsshowedtreatmentpreventwatersamplesHowever4-foldhigherconcentrationrequiredachieveeffectmaythereforeusefulpracticalenvironmentalinvestigationsComparisonethidiumdetection

Similar Articles

Cited By (19)