The effect of duration and amplitude of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) on spinal stiffness.

Michèle Vaillant, Tiffany Edgecombe, Cynthia R Long, Joel G Pickar, Gregory N Kawchuk
Author Information
  1. Michèle Vaillant: University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) force magnitude and force duration on the Spinal stiffness of a feline preparation. A mechanical device performed simulated SMTs at the L6 spinous process in 22 anesthetised felines. Animals were divided into four groups. Two groups (no preload, preload) received SMT having maximal displacements of 1.0 mm, 2.0 mm and 3.0 mm of total displacement (displacement control). In two other groups (preload, no preload), SMTs were applied with maximal loads of 25%, 55% and 85% body weight (force control). Each of the SMTs were applied in order of increasing displacement or force amplitudes, at increasing durations ranging from 25 to 250 ms. Spinal stiffness was quantified by applying an indentation load to external surface of the back. Linear mixed effects models were fit for post-SMT stiffness variables. When SMT was applied under displacement control with and without a preceding preload, a significant interactive effect occurred between force magnitude and force duration (p ≤ 0.05) for some of the stiffness variables. The findings from this experiment demonstrate that Spinal stiffness in a feline model was affected by the interaction of the force amplitude and force duration parameters but the exact nature of this interaction remains unclear. This study provides guidance for further investigation given other SMT parameters not tested here may facilitate the ability of SMT to alter Spinal stiffness.

References

  1. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Jun 3;138(11):871-81 [PMID: 12779297]
  2. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2004 Jan;27(1):1-15 [PMID: 14739869]
  3. Spine J. 2009 Jan-Feb;9(1):77-86 [PMID: 17983845]
  4. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2010 Oct;33(8):585-93 [PMID: 21036280]
  5. Man Ther. 2008 Aug;13(4):341-8 [PMID: 17951096]
  6. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Dec 1;34(25):2720-9 [PMID: 19940729]
  7. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2001 Feb;24(2):84-91 [PMID: 11208220]
  8. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2010 Jul;14(3):280-6 [PMID: 20538226]
  9. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Sep 1;33(19):E673-9 [PMID: 18758348]
  10. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Mar 15;31(6):623-31 [PMID: 16540864]
  11. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2007 Feb;30(2):116-23 [PMID: 17320732]
  12. Man Ther. 1998 Feb;3(1):21-26 [PMID: 11487297]
  13. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2011 Mar-Apr;34(3):173-80 [PMID: 21492752]
  14. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2006 Mar;21(3):254-62 [PMID: 16378668]
  15. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006 Jan;29(1):22-31 [PMID: 16396726]
  16. Man Ther. 2012 Jun;17(3):241-5 [PMID: 22386279]
  17. Man Ther. 2002 Feb;7(1):19-25 [PMID: 11884152]
  18. Phys Ther. 1996 Feb;76(2):158-65 [PMID: 8592719]
  19. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Sep;86(9):1745-52 [PMID: 16181937]
  20. J Neurosci Methods. 1999 Jul 15;89(2):87-96 [PMID: 10491938]
  21. Phys Ther. 2007 Apr;87(4):431-40 [PMID: 17341509]
  22. Spine J. 2001 Mar-Apr;1(2):121-30 [PMID: 14588392]
  23. J Chiropr Educ. 2011 Fall;25(2):125-31 [PMID: 22069337]
  24. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Oct 1;36(21):1772-81 [PMID: 21358568]
  25. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993 Jul;18(9):1206-12 [PMID: 8362328]
  26. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Sep 1;22(17):1955-64 [PMID: 9306523]
  27. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010 Nov;40(11):685-93 [PMID: 20710095]
  28. Spine J. 2002 Sep-Oct;2(5):357-71 [PMID: 14589467]
  29. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1996 Jan;19(1):13-8 [PMID: 8903696]
  30. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2003 Jan;26(1):34-9 [PMID: 12532136]
  31. Aust J Physiother. 1992;38(2):115-23 [PMID: 25025643]
  32. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Oct 15;35(22):1983-90 [PMID: 20881661]
  33. Spine J. 2004 May-Jun;4(3):335-56 [PMID: 15125860]
  34. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1993 Nov-Dec;16(9):573-7 [PMID: 8133191]
  35. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Nov 15;27(22):2459-66 [PMID: 12435975]

Grants

  1. U19 AT004137/NCCIH NIH HHS
  2. U19 AAT004137/PHS HHS

MeSH Term

Animals
Biomechanical Phenomena
Cats
Elasticity
Low Back Pain
Manipulation, Spinal
Models, Animal
Spine
Time Factors

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0forcestiffnessspinalSMTpreloadduration0displacementeffectSMTsgroupsmmcontrolappliedstudymanipulativetherapymagnitudefelinemaximalincreasingvariablesinteractionamplitudeparametersaimdeterminepreparationmechanicaldeviceperformedsimulatedL6spinousprocess22anesthetisedfelinesAnimalsdividedfourTworeceiveddisplacements123totaltwoloads25%55%85%bodyweightorderamplitudesdurationsranging25250msSpinalquantifiedapplyingindentationloadexternalsurfacebackLinearmixedeffectsmodelsfitpost-SMTwithoutprecedingsignificantinteractiveoccurredp05findingsexperimentdemonstratemodelaffectedexactnatureremainsunclearprovidesguidanceinvestigationgiventestedmayfacilitateabilityalter

Similar Articles

Cited By (15)